"A new vision" (Part 1)
Introduction
Given that the topic about "Stereotypes" has
been repeatedly in class, I believe that it is appropriate to share a clarification
(linked to the world of art and culture), which I think you might mean them a
contribution to their knowledge.
Recently; Sociology,
Anthropology and Literature have defined a classification for characters in the media, concerning to
the ‘social image of a group’, that a character helps to convey. Within this
group are distinguished: Stereotypes, Prototypes, Archetypes and Human Kinds.
Stereotypes
Stereotypes are generalized
and static images of the conduct, appearance and way of thinking of a specific human
group. Given how easy it’s to include
them in different context, stereotypes have been
used as recurring, this resulted in building a trite and predictable view of a
community, depending of some factor in specific; inculcating us the idea that
we "know" this group, even without us concerned by contrast the ideas
we have with the reality. When we don’t this exercise, we create prejudices.
With regard to the capacity
of the stereotypes demonstrate sustainability in time, should be appointment at
the film The Breakfast Club, directed
by John Hughes (1985), which
according to experts in film consolidated the stereotypes of the American
school community. Note how twenty-five years later, television series Glee (Broadcast in Fox since 2009) used
these images as the basis for its characters, even though the writers granted
certain "reliefs and nuances" to give them depth.
Prototypes
Prototypes are
characters that enclose the "perfection" of a group of features,
meaning an ideal of conduct and
thought. Examples of this are the characters of Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare (1597) and Tristan and Isolde (anonymous legend), who are passionate, sensitive and unforgiving lovers ready
to do everything to overcome the social adversity and love forever. As well as
stereotypes arise from an arbitrary generalization, the prototypes arise from
an idealization of the human characteristics in its maximum expression.
Prototypes tend to be confused with stereotypes because they are also used as
"models" that are repeatedly present in the narrative. It happens
because they also possess some cultural impact in the media; however, the
prototypes don’t generalize the feeling, thinking and acting of a community or
group, but are only reinvented ‘ideals of personality’, depending on context. Prototypes
usually have a name and its reproduction tends to be judged as an imitation.
For example, Marilyn Monroe is the ‘prototype of a sensual woman’, then, the
actresses who spread a sensual image of themselves tend to be taken as
‘analogous’ to the model imposed by Monroe.
(to be continue... Bibliography will be included in the final part)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your contribution Nielsen, I've learned a little more today! I've never heard the concept of "prototypes" and I found it so interesting, because with the "stereotypes" we join features to descrive a person or a group. But "prototypes" It's like the "dreamed" or "perfect group" Good contribution
ReplyDelete(sorry a removed the first comment for few ortography mistakes)
don't worry and don't miss the second part (coming soon).
ReplyDeletenielsen I'm agree with Silvana thanks to you I've leaned about stereotypes, I read part 1 & 2 so I can say I have a lot "roles" not only one :)
ReplyDelete